The Drift Watch

Unlawful Deportation of Protected Immigrant in Defiance of Federal Legal Status

An analyzed authoritarian drift event.

Judiciary High

March 15, 2025

What Happened

The Trump administration, through DHS/ICE, deported Kilmar Abrego Garcia — a Maryland resident with protected legal status under U.S. immigration law since 2019 — to El Salvador. This action was taken despite the fact that Garcia’s legal status should have prevented deportation under federal statutes. The U.S. Supreme Court later intervened, ordering the administration to return Garcia to the United States, citing a clear violation of due process and legal protections.

Why It Matters

This is not an administrative oversight — it’s a direct contravention of legal protections afforded by federal law. Deporting a lawfully protected individual without judicial review or due process undermines the rule of law and sets a dangerous precedent: that executive immigration enforcement can override judicial safeguards.

How It Contributes to the Drift

The action demonstrates executive overreach into legal protections typically safeguarded by the judiciary. If the executive branch can unilaterally deport protected residents — even temporarily — it erodes faith in due process and weakens judicial authority. It sends a chilling message to legally protected immigrants that even court-validated status may not shield them from state power.

These aren’t just trends — they’re tactics.

Learn the pattern before it becomes the new normal.